Daniel Milavsky vs William Bartram Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milavsky vs Bartram analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Milavsky vs William Bartram Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Bartram
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milavsky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bartram has won 31.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milavsky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bartram has won 57.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milavsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bartram has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milavsky has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 7/ 4), with Bartram winning 33.33% (W/L 3/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milavsky has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Bartram has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 5/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Milavsky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4), where as Bartram has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 3/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milavsky winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Milavsky winning 2 and Bartram winning 0. The last match between Milavsky and Bartram was at the M25 Laval, 09-07-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milavsky and Bartram have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milavsky winning 0 times and Bartram 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Milavsky winning 0, and Bartram 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milavsky has played against opponents with an average rank of 67.55 while Bartram has played against players with an average rank of 73.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milavsky has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bartram has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milavsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bartram has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (8-7)
Career Total W/L
31% (5-11)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Milavsky | William Bartram |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:19:0 | 1:19:0 |
1st Serve % | 41% (20/49) | 40% (24/60) |
1st Serve Win% | 85% (17/20) | 50% (12/24) |
2nd Serve Win% | 62% (18/29) | 50% (18/36) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 50% (30/60) | 29% (14/49) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Daniel Milavsky
Player
William Bartram
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
24 of
60)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Milavsky | William Bartram |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (34/44) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 0 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.05 |
DFs Total | 0 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 165.75 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (49/78) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (28/49) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 31% (9/29) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (25/61) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Daniel Milavsky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Kareem Allaf
Player
Daniel Milavsky
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
17 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Ezekiel Clark
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Milavsky
Player
J Mercer
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Benjamin Thomas George
Player
Daniel Milavsky
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Igor Danich
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Milavsky
Player
William Bartram
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
24 of
60)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Daniel Milavsky
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
William Bartram Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Eric David Verdes
Player
William Bartram
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Vito Dell'Elba
Player
William Bartram
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Daniel Milavsky
Player
William Bartram
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
24 of
60)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more